taubercat Thank you very much for letting me know about this! 🙂
It looks like I was incorrect: Words are suggested for review after 1.5x time has passed, rather than 2x.
Another problem is that the algorithm uses the time since a word was last reviewed, but the website only shows the total time remembered since learning the word. For example, here are the times you reviewed the word здорово and the associated data that My Little Word Land is tracking:
Reviewed at | Time since last review | Total time remembered |
2025-01-10 15:57 | 0 | Just learned |
2025-01-10 17:31 | 2 hours and 34 minutes | 2 hours and 34 minutes |
2025-01-11 14:49 | 21 hours 18 minutes | 22 hours 52 minutes |
2025-01-13 09:32 | 1 day, 18 hours, and 43 minutes | 2 days, 17 hours, 35 minutes |
2025-01-16 08:29 | 2 days, 22 hours, 57 minutes | 5 days, 16 hours, 32 minutes |
2025-01-21 18:37 | 5 days, 10 hours, 8 minutes | 11 days, 2 hours, 40 minutes |
The algorithm marks a word as being ready for review when more time has passed than 1.5 x "Time since last review". For example, здорово would be up for review again when:
- 5 days 10 hours, 8 minutes x 1.5 has passed
- 5 days 10 hours 8 minutes x 1.5 = 8 days 3 hours 12 minutes
- 2025-01-21 18:37 + 8 days 3 hours 12 minutes = 2025-01-29 21:49
Therefore, здорово would be up for review again on 2025-01-29 21:49 . This would make the total time remembered be 19 days 5 hours 52 minutes.
I think there are a few issues:
- The algorithm is using 1.5x instead of 2x. Let me see if I can quickly add a setting for adjusting this 🙂
- The "Remembered" column that's displayed on a course's Overview page isn't what's used to calculate when a word is ready to be reviewed, which is confusing.
- The "Remembered" column is always cut down to just one word. For example, "5 days, 16 hours, 32 minutes" is shown as just "5 days". I did this to keep the column narrow, but in some cases, cutting off the more detailed time information might be confusing.
Let me think about how to fix this. I think adding an option to adjust the review time multiplier should be a good start 🙂